Uncovered Meat & Other Horror Stories
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38033/38033be34b72f33ad82873a76f93588cc91b8a15" alt=""
None other than Egyptian-born Sheikh Taj Din al-Hilali,
"In a Ramadan sermon in a Sydney mosque, Sheikh al-Hilali suggested that a group of Muslim men recently jailed for many years for gang rapes were not entirely to blame ... If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it..whose fault is it - the cats or the uncovered meat?"
Of course the
There were women, he said, who 'sway suggestively' and wore make-up and immodest dress "and then you get a judge without mercy and gives you 65 years. But the problem, but the problem all began with who (sic)?" he said, referring to the women victims.
Yes victims. The women's victims. Oh, the pitfalls of being a man, having to live in a world with oversexed women (such as I) who are nothing more than the devil's agent in his evil quest to accumulate good Muslim (male) souls. In fact, according to the Sheikh, we make up half of his standing army. "Onward Slutty Soldiers, marching off to war ...."
Women, he said, were 'weapons' used by Satan to control men.
My goodness but this makes it difficult to see Islam as a religion of "peace and enlightenment". Especially when you read a translation of his speech in which he also claims that all Christians and Jews will end up" in hell. And not part-time. For eternity. They are the worst in God's creation." As an atheist and a woman (a double damnation whammy), I assume that I'll be relegated to standing at the Hell's door, holding it open for the other "people of the book".
And what happened to the Sheikh? Needless to say, his comments didn't go unheard. Although his followers responded with a hearty round of applause as he concluded hi
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c47ff/c47ff81903930000fa72963bf7fadd01ebc7edc1" alt=""
Many people - including some Muslim leaders - have called for the cleric to be dismissed from office.
Well, there's a thought. Or better yet, give him the same sentence that backwards heads-up-their-asses fundamentalists would give to a "wanton woman": stone him. No no no, I'm above this, I'm a better person in spite of my full-time tenure in hell - perhaps we could just put him on a diet of cat food for the next 6 months. That'll give him something to chew on.
7 Comments:
"...the problem all began with WHOM?"
The objective of "who" is "whom".
How does he expect anyone to respect his word if his use of the language is so sloppy?
I wonder if, at Muslim Clerics Seminary, he was one of those guys who, on the very first day of class (and always from the front row) put up his hand and asked, "Does spelling and grammar count?", and then whine big-time when the prof/cleric said, "Yes, of course."
There was always one of those in every class...
I must confess that I was tempted to add a sic when I first read it. In fact, I think I will before I dot another i or cross another t.
But you're not going around with wet hair, right?
Because of course you haven't just come from a hammam, you've just showered after raunchy sex.
(I was warned about this so many times. Ugh!)
Tickle, I still can't access your blog :(
I think Knarf is missing the point...
I'm known for missing the point!
If the Devil's using women as tools against men, it's clear his workmanship is pretty shoddy. I mean, if his plan was really effective - if we were a viable means of propagating evil - wouldn't the world look a little different than it does today? Ergo, the Devil doesn't know what he's doing so concern can be shifted away from the estrogen threat and onto more pertinent matters, such as something else.
Post a Comment
<< Home